Chicago Health | Homepage
Doctor-rating websites offer helpful but limited advice

Doctor-rating websites offer helpful but limited advice

By Julie Corliss, Harvard Health Letters

If you’ve ever used the Internet to find a health care provider, chances are you’ve run across doctor-rating sites like Healthgrades.com or RateMDs.com. In addition, websites that offer reviews of everything from restaurants to repairmen (such as Yelp and Angie’s List) also feature critiques of doctors, dentists, and other clinicians. A recent survey found that nearly a third of Americans had read patients’ online comments about clinicians, and that 21 percent had used them when choosing a clinician.

Narrative reviews, in which patients describe their experiences with clinicians in their own words, can be helpful for consumers and clinicians alike, according to a Sounding Board article in this week’s New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). But these reports would be even more valuable if they were elicited and reported with the same scientific rigor used to collect other types of health information, the authors say.

“Reducing feedback to checkmarks or star ratings is not very useful. We need some type of standardized format so consumers can leave thoughtful comments that are helpful for both consumers and health care providers,” says Dr. Helen Riess, associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and director of the Empathy and Relational Science Program at Massachusetts General Hospital.

For consumers, narratives can add valuable context to the star ratings that often accompany reviews and allow readers to zero in on reviews from people with similar problems, needs, and preferences. If you understand why someone gave a clinician a certain score, you can then weigh what you learn about various aspects of each physician against what’s most important to you.

While some doctors assume that most people who write online physician reviews want to vent about a negative experience, that’s apparently not the case. Studies suggest that most — between 65 percent and 90 percent- of online patient reviews are positive.

“For a clinician, detailed feedback from patients can help reinforce what you’re doing right and better understand what matters most to your patients,” says Dr. James Sabin, professor of population medicine and psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and director of the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Ethics Program.

Of course, some people may be reluctant to describe a negative experience with a clinician due to a fear — real or imagined — of retribution, says Riess. “Many people view doctors as authority figures. If you anger or annoy a doctor, you may worry that your care will suffer,” she says.

In her psychiatry practice, some of her patients share stories of feeling dismissed, shamed, or even ridiculed by their other providers. “I think if these providers understood the emotional impact of feeling unheard or dismissed, it would change how they behave toward their patients,” she says. That’s the goal of Empathetics, a company Riess created that provides empathy and interpersonal skills training for medical professionals.

It’s certainly plausible that you could find an empathetic doctor by reading online reviews, as many write-ups include details about how well the doctor listens and whether he or she is caring or compassionate. But there’s a downside to this approach, as the NEJM article points out. The doctor-rating websites found most easily in Web searches all include space for patient comments. But only 40 percent of them present data on other quality metrics, such as how well the providers perform in terms of offering timely appointments and following guidelines for preventive screening tests.

In addition, most of the existing websites post comments from any source, with no assurance that they come from real, recent patients. And the comment-only sites are usually commercial sites with ad-driven revenues to boost their rankings on Internet searches, Sabin notes. So, he advises, don’t rely solely on those reviews.

As my colleague Heidi Godman wrote in her post about hospital ratings, it’s best to use all the information available to you to be an educated health consumer. If you’re looking for a new clinician, Sabin recommends first asking trusted friends or family members. Then check the online reviews of that specific clinician and his or her group practice, if applicable.

Look for a doctor with lots of comments — at least 20 to 25 — and don’t be overly concerned if the reviews are mixed. If you have a specific health condition, look for measures that tell you how well the practice manages people with the same problem, and what patients say about their overall experience with the clinician and the practice as a whole.

(Julie Corliss is executive editor of the Harvard Heart Letter)

(C) 2015. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLGE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.

Similar Articles

Doctors shouldn’t routinely recommend e-cigarettes to smokers

Doctors shouldn’t routinely recommend e-cigarettes to smokers

Source: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill The health benefits of quitting smoking are widely

5 reasons you should have a family doctor

5 reasons you should have a family doctor

By Michael Rabovsky, M.D. If you have a medical need -- sudden flu symptoms, nagging back

Anesthesiologists Form New Megapractice

Anesthesiologists Form New Megapractice

By Tom Mullaney Anesthesiologists are expert at putting people to sleep. Now, a group of approximately

Demystifying Doctor and Hospital Ratings

Demystifying Doctor and Hospital Ratings

When looking at online doctor ratings sites, consider the source By Leigh Page With thousands of doctors

Indie Docs Versus the Networks

Indie Docs Versus the Networks

The pros and cons of hospital groups and independent physicians comes down to groups of

Articles By Category

Family Health

In The Know

CH Lifestyle

January 2017
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
December 25, 2016 December 26, 2016 December 27, 2016 December 28, 2016 December 29, 2016 December 30, 2016 December 31, 2016
January 1, 2017 January 2, 2017 January 3, 2017 January 4, 2017 January 5, 2017 January 6, 2017 January 7, 2017
January 8, 2017 January 9, 2017 January 10, 2017 January 11, 2017 January 12, 2017 January 13, 2017 January 14, 2017
January 15, 2017 January 16, 2017 January 17, 2017 January 18, 2017 January 19, 2017 January 20, 2017 January 21, 2017
January 22, 2017 January 23, 2017 January 24, 2017 January 25, 2017 January 26, 2017 January 27, 2017 January 28, 2017
January 29, 2017 January 30, 2017 January 31, 2017 February 1, 2017 February 2, 2017 February 3, 2017 February 4, 2017

Categories

Recent Comments

Swing for the fences in the fight to Sideline Pancreatic Cancer

Swing for the fences in the fight to Sideline Pancreatic Cancer

Enjoy a great night of baseball at Peoples Natural

VIEW ARTICLE
Cost to give birth 1943 - Page 3 - Defending The Truth Political Forum

Cost to give birth 1943 - Page 3 - Defending The Truth Political Forum

A Hazy Shade of Healthcare: What does tort reform

VIEW ARTICLE

Archives